——–
A PREFACE
by Professor Dag Østerberg
The writings of Marx occupy a paramount position within the history
of ideas, not only because of their momentous impact upon the historical
process, but also owing to their intrinsic value and truth.
Marx’s activity as a scientific and philosophical writer persisted
during four decades – from the youthful, first attempts to come to grips
with social and political reality to the gigantic enterprise of his
maturity; from his partly unpublished writings to found a new doctrine
of History to the masterly exposition of the capitalist mode of
production and the concomitant critique of prevailing political economy.
In the course of this time span, Marx, like most thinkers, changed in
many ways, and this fact raises the question of continuity. To what
extent is the work of Marx a unified whole? To what extent does it fall
apart in to several different, even mutually exclusive, doctrines? These
are not merely the questions of concern to the historian and the
biographer; they direct our attention to our understanding of essential
features of our society, such as, for instance, the proper relationship
between politics and technics, or between individual personality and
sociality.
Nasir Khan has devoted himself to the study of some of Marx’s early
writings, with special reference to his treatment of man’s alienation.
The notion of alienation came into the foreground after the publication
in the ‘thirties of the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts, where it
plays a decisive rôle. Since then, Marx’s use of the alienation concept
has been a permanent topic of investigation and discussion, bearing on
the sense of Marx’s humanist stance, and its relation to a positivist
conception of science.
Nasir Khan’s monograph is another contribution to this field of
research. His study is not intended as an introduction to the
problematic, but rather addresses the advanced reader, who has already
acquired a basic knowledge of Marx and Engels’ ‘materialist conception
of history’ in general, their main works, the history of Marxist
thought and practice, and the concept of alienation as an aspect of
human subjugation and suffering.
The author deals with this subject matter in a thoroughly scholarly
manner. His work is based upon a close scrutiny of the original texts,
and displays an impressive command of the enormous literature commenting
on what Marx wrote. He himself purports, not to revolutionise the
current interpretations, but to restate them a little more clearly than
the preceding authors, by utilising what they have said in their texts.
In this way, the present work makes a specialised contribution within
the world-wide research activity.
The field of inquiry is strictly limited, concentrating on what Marx
wrote on alienation within an interval of 17-18 months, between March
1843 and August 1844. This narrow scope permits a very detailed account,
following the sinuosities of Marx’s itinerary as he strives for
clarity, passing from the critique of politics to that of private
property, and arriving at an understanding of alienated human existence,
founded upon a conception of what a truly rich human existence would
be. To participate in the discussion about whether the notion of
alienation is essential merely in Marx’s early writings is not the main
purpose of Nasir Khan. He does however make his standpoint clear,
stating, and in my opinion rightly, that the concept and doctrine of
alienation are fundamental to Marx’s thought from the beginning to the
end.
The ‘death’ of Marxism has been proclaimed over and over again, and
today, in the wake of the rapid political changes in Eastern Europe,
this proclamation is perhaps made more triumphantly than ever before.
But it is clear that the perishing of these regimes cannot disprove the
truth of Marx’s doctrines. For one thing, the strong revival and renewal
of the Marxist movement in the ‘sixties and ‘seventies took place
rather in spite of, and not because of, the achievements of these
regimes. Hence, their dismantling changes little or nothing on the
scientific level, even if it may serve as a pretext for those who for
other reasons want to break with Marxist thought. Moreover, the economic
and social conditions in Western Europe nowadays do not at all warrant
any en bloc rejection of Marxian conceptions. Governmental policies
based upon ‘the general theory of employment’ no longer ensure
approximately full employment, with the consequence that new social
strata resembling Marx’s ‘reserve army’ of wage labourers have appeared.
The ‘welfare state’, the declared function of which is to guarantee
certain basic rights and thus to make the class struggle less urgent,
shows alarming signs of weakness. All experts agree that socio-economic
inequality has increased and that class cleavages have become sharpened
contrary to the optimistic perspectives on our future some decades ago.
Yet, the validity of Marxian conceptions does not, to my mind,
ultimately depend upon such events and trends. Rather, the basic
conceptions of Marxian thought, such as that of human alienation, should
be understood as an internal critique of the basic Liberal notions of
the Individual, the Market, and the State. These notions are
constitutive of a social order, the hypocrisy and insufficiency of which
are uncovered by Marxist thought. This Liberal order and its capitalist
mode of production are still expanding throughout the world. For this
reason, the Marxian critique is still ‘alive’ and indispensable for the
understanding of the human world, and this holds both for the critique
of political economy and the critique of human alienation, the theme of
the present study.
Oslo, June 1991
Dag Österberg
Professor of Sociology
University of Oslo
For downloading the book, click on the following:
