I was born in Poonch (Kashmir) and now I live in Norway. I oppose war and violence and am a firm believer in the peaceful co-existence of all nations and peoples. In my academic work I have tried to espouse the cause of the weak and the oppressed in a world dominated by power politics, misleading propaganda and violations of basic human rights. I also believe that all conscious members of society have a moral duty to stand for and further the cause of peace and human rights throughout the world.
Note: Greg Maybury is a writer and blogger from Australia. He has
compiled the following historical information and presented it in a
condensed form for all. It is of paramount importance to comprehend the
savage and murderous colonialism of France in Africa, and the
information he has gathered is verifiable.
-
Another slice of our past narrative
missing from those not-so-reliable tomes that we call history books.
Fact check this mes cheries. ===
France gathered 400 Muslim scholars and
beheaded them. In 1917 AD, during the occupation of Chad. In 1852, when
France entered the city of Laghouat in Algeria, it killed two-thirds of
its population in a single night and burned them alive.
France occupied Algeria for 132 years. In
the first 7 years after their arrival, the French eliminated 1 million
Muslims, and in the last 7 years before their departure, they eliminated
1.5 million Muslims. The French historian Jacques Gorky estimated that
the total number of Muslims killed in Algeria from France’s arrival in
1830 to its departure in 1962 was 10 million.
France occupied Tunisia for 75 years, Algeria for 132 years, Morocco for 44 years, and Mauritania for 60 years.
When France entered Egypt during its
famous campaign, French soldiers on horseback entered mosques and raped
free women in front of their families. They drank wine in the mosques
and turned them into stables for their horses.
It is strange to see some people boasting
about and defending French civilization, forgetting all its dark
history. This is France; remind them of its history.
When France entered the city of Aghwat (Laghouat) in Algeria in 1852,
it burned two-thirds of its inhabitants to death in just one night.
France conducted 17 nuclear tests in Algeria between 1960 and 1966,
resulting in an unknown number of deaths estimated between 27,000 and
100,000 and the effects persist to this day.
When France left Algeria in 1962, it left behind 11 million landmines more than the total population of Algeria at the time.
France occupied Algeria for 132 years. In just the first seven years of
their occupation, they massacred one million Muslims, and in the last
seven years, they martyred another 1.5 million Muslims.
France is the fourth largest holder of gold reserves in the world, with
2,436 tons of gold stored at the Bank of France, even though France has
no active gold mines.
In contrast, Mali one of the world’s largest gold producers with 14 official gold mines has no gold reserves of its own.
Similarly, the Republic of Congo, which ranks seventh among
gold-producing countries, also has no gold reserves in its central bank.
On 7 May 2026, Trita Parsi and I were on
the podcast of the “Community Alliance 4 Peace and Justice” hosted by
Mehlaqa Samdani. It provided us with an excellent opportunity to talk
about President Trump’s “Project Freedom,” which he announced on 3 May
2026 and launched the following day, 4 May 2026, only to pause it the
following day, 5 May 2026.
It is clear that the president is
desperately searching for a way to bring the war to an end on favorable
terms for the US and Israel, but just can’t find a workable strategy.
Trita and I believe there is no way he can win this war in any
meaningful way, and indeed, the US and Israel have lost it. Trita,
however, is a bit more optimistic than I am about getting a meaningful
ceasefire and working out a deal that ends the war. Let’s hope he is
right.
THE entire peace movement opposed the
US/Israeli war against Iran. Opposition went well beyond those normally
opposing US actions. It is widely understood that resistance by the
peoples of Iran, Lebanon and Yemen, together with the war’s unpopularity
in the US, led to Trump losing the first rounds of the conflict.
Even the Wall Street Journal, a fervent
supporter of the war, admitted this: “Trump screamed at aides for hours.
The Europeans aren’t helping, he said repeatedly. Gas prices averaged
$4.09. Images of the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis… had been looming large
in his mind, people who have spoken to him said. ‘If you look at what
happened with Jimmy Carter…with the helicopters and the hostages, it
cost them the election,’ Trump had said in March. ‘What a mess.’”
But it is a misjudgement to believe that
because the US and Israel lost the first battle, therefore they have
lost the war and are resigned to this. Instead, the peace movement must
prepare for a prolonged struggle to defeat US and Israeli attacks on
Iran.
Some genuinely taking the right side in
this war have written that the US has already suffered its biggest
defeat since Vietnam, or even that this is a bigger defeat.
Unfortunately, this is a misanalysis. To
prepare for the prolonged anti-war tasks to come, the situation must be
seen accurately.
Precisely because if the US loses the war
against Iran it would be its biggest defeat since Vietnam, it has no
intention of giving up because it lost the first battle.
US ruling circles understand perfectly
that US loss of the war would mean significant erosion of the
credibility of its international threats, significantly weakening its
global position.
They therefore simply conclude that the
wrong tactic was chosen, and the US must change this to win the
struggle. Even some forces in the US who believe launching the war was a
tactical mistake believe that now it has started it must be won.
The Institute for the Study of War put it
specifically: “Any US settlement or resolution of the conflict that
enables Iran to control traffic through the Strait of Hormuz would
represent a major US defeat.” As the Wall Street Journal summarised: “As
the president said in his first term, the US shouldn’t start a war it
doesn’t intend to win. His challenge now is to prove to Iran’s regime he
meant what he said.”
The new US tactics to attempt to win the
war can be clearly grasped if it is understood why it lost the first
battle. Prior to the first military attack on Iran in June 2025, and the
widespread assault launched in February, US policy under Trump had been
to force Iran to capitulate to US demands by prolonged
economic sanctions.
The US has now intensified this attack,
after its defeat in the first round of the war, via its blockade of
Iranian ships, with Trump claiming: “Iran is collapsing financially!
They want the Strait of Hormuz opened immediately… Starving for cash!”
Such sanctions genuinely damaged Iran’s
economy, creating a priority for Iran to attempt to break out of them,
while the US can return to bombing anytime it chooses.
Israel, and some in the US, considered
sanctions strategically inadequate. Iran is a huge country, 80 times
Israel’s size geographically, larger than the EU’s four largest
countries put together. Iran’s population is 90 million, compared to
Israel’s 10 million. In real economic terms, parity purchasing powers
(PPPs), Iran’s GDP is three times Israel’s.
Faced with larger states, Israel’s policy
has been, where it is unable to help create governments favourable to
itself, to attempt to disintegrate and weaken them — as shown in Iraq
and Syria. Israel, judging it unlikely there will be a compliant
Iranian government, has long sought to disintegrate that country.
Therefore, Iran faces an existential threat from Israel.
The US itself turned to a military assault
on Iran, as opposed to sanctions, because of its and Israel’s victories
in its genocidal attack on Gaza and also in Syria — where reactionary
forces, which Israel and the US supported, came to power.
Israel and the US miscalculated that they
could now achieve the same in Iran. The US supplied thousands of
Starlink systems and, as Trump publicly admitted, guns to demonstrators
in Iran in December and January.
But not only did this fail to overthrow
Iran’s government but when the US and Israel launched their full-scale
military attack on Iran in February, as even Western media admitted,
there was a “rallying around the flag” in Iran — in political terms, the
great majority of Iran’s population, whatever their differences on
other issues, or their attitude to Iran’s government, united in
opposition to the US attack. This was the basis of the US defeat in the
first round of the war.
But the US cannot retreat from this
conflict due to the role west Asia plays in its strategy. A mistaken
analysis was put forward a few years ago that because, due to fracking,
the US has become self-sufficient in oil, it would be less interested in
controlling west Asia.
The facts show the opposite. The US has waged more wars in the region — against Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon and Iran.
The US is no longer being itself dependent
on West Asia, but constantly waging wars there, has led some to claim
that this is because Israel controls US foreign policy — that the tail
wags the dog. Any analysis of the relation of forces between the two
makes clear this is untrue. Israel cannot produce the weapons it relies
on to carry out military terror; the US merely has to threaten to cut
off arms and Israel would immediately be brought to heel.
This reality was made clear for all to see
when Trump, for short-term tactical reasons, openly enforced an end to
Israel’s bombing of Beirut, declaring: “Israel will not be bombing
Lebanon any longer. They are PROHIBITED from doing so by the US.” The US
does not support Israel because it is controlled by it but because the
US finds Israel useful for its own strategy.
Although the US does not need west Asia’s oil for itself, its strategy is to be able to deny it to others, particularly China.
Because this is key for the US, it will
not give up its attack on Iran, only the forms will change. Therefore,
the peace movement must prepare for a prolonged struggle against US
aggression against Iran.
John Ross is senior fellow at the
Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China,
and a member of No Cold War Britain.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez
awards the Order of Civil Merit to UN Special Rapporteur Francesca
Albanese, on 7 May 2026 [sanchezcastejon/X]
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez
awarded on Thursday the Order of Civil Merit to UN Special Rapporteur
Francesca Albanese, recognizing her work documenting violations of
international law in the Gaza Strip, Anadolu reports.
Sanchez received Francesca Albanese in
Madrid, where they discussed the situation in Palestine, the importance
of international law and “the need for an immediate end to the violence
and the building of a lasting peace based on dignity and humanity,”
according to a government statement.
“Public responsibility also implies the
moral obligation of not looking away,” Sanchez wrote on social media,
praising Albanese as “a voice that upholds the conscience of the world.”
The Order of Civil Merit is one of Spain’s
highest civilian honors and is awarded to Spanish and foreign citizens
for extraordinary services benefiting the state or society.
Albanese, an Italian legal scholar, has
served since 2022 as the UN special rapporteur on the situation of human
rights in the occupied Palestinian territories. She has become one of
the most prominent international voices criticizing Israel’s military
operations in Gaza.
On Tuesday, Sanchez also sent a letter to
the European Commission calling for the activation of the EU’s Blocking
Statute to counter US sanctions imposed on Albanese as well as judges
and prosecutors from the International Criminal Court.
“It’s like an international mafia — they
want to silence everyone who demands an end to genocide, an end to the
crimes,” Albanese told Spanish broadcaster RTVE, referring to the
sanctions against her.
Also on Thursday, Spanish Foreign Minister
Jose Manuel Albares criticized Israel’s continued detention of
Spanish-Palestinian activist Saif Abukeshek, calling it “inadmissible
and unacceptable.”
Jose Manuel Albares told the Spanish
parliament that he summoned Israel’s top envoy in Spain on Wednesday to
discuss the situation and had also spoken with Israeli Foreign Minister
Gideon Saar.
Albares said Abukeshek was “illegally”
detained in international waters where Israel had “no jurisdiction”
while traveling with a Gaza-bound humanitarian aid flotilla.
“Spain reacted without hesitation, with
complete clarity and firmness, in response to violations of
international law,” Albares said.
It has now emerged that Trump’s decision to pause the operation was driven by complaints by Saudi Arabia, two US officials told NBC News.
Saudi Arabia’s leaders had been angered by
the announcement and the government told the US it would not allow
American military forces to fly aircraft through Prince Sultan Airbase,
located southeast of its capital, Riyadh.
Officials said the Kingdom denied access for any US aircraft to fly through Saudi airspace as part of Project Freedom.
A call is reported to have taken place between Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, but the pair were unable to reach a resolution – forcing the US president to axe the operation.
Trump has ruffled feathers across the Gulf with seemingly unilateral decisions (Reuters)
The leaders “have been in touch regularly” and officials are also in touch with vice president JD Vance, secretary of state Marco Rubio, a Saudi source told NBC News.
“The problem with that premise is that
things are happening quickly in real time,” the source said about the
announcement, adding that the country was “very supportive of the
diplomatic efforts” by Pakistan to guide the countries towards an
agreement.
A White House official told NBC News that “regional allies were notified in advance.”
The Independent has contacted the White House for comment.
A diplomat in the region said that the
operation was not coordinated with Oman either. “The US made an
announcement and then coordinated with us,” they said, adding, “We were
not upset or angry.”
Trump’s project is said to have angered the Saudi leadership (Getty)
“Because of geography, you need
cooperation from regional partners to utilise their airspace along their
borders,” one US official explained about the success of the scheme.
The Strait of Hormuz is a vital shipping
route for global supplies of oil, fertiliser and other commodities that
has been virtually closed since the US and Israel attacked Iran on 28
February, causing global price rises.
West Bank commander boasts about
high death toll and defends looser rules of engagement, including firing
at unarmed Palestinians
An Israeli soldier stands on guard during
an army raid at a cafe in the Rafidia neighbourhood of Nablus in the
occupied West Bank on 23 April 2026 (Nasser Ishtayeh / SOPA Images via
Reuters)
Published date: 4 May 2026 14:13 BST | Last update:2 days 20 hours ago
Israel’s top commander in the occupied West Bank has said the army is killing Palestinians at levels “not seen since 1967”, according to Haaretz.
Avi Bluth, head of the Israeli army’s
Central Command, made the remarks in a closed forum, where he also
defended looser rules of engagement allowing troops to fire at unarmed
Palestinians.
He acknowledged a discriminatory approach
whereby Jewish Israeli stone-throwers are not targeted while
Palestinians carrying out similar acts are fired at.
“In three years, we have killed 1,500 terrorists,” he said, referring to Palestinians.
“So how is there no intifada? Why aren’t
they taking to the streets? Why is the Palestinian public indifferent?
Why are there no disturbances?” Bluth, a settler who has been the
Israeli army commander in the West Bank since 2024, added.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
“The Arabs understand that ‘if someone
rises to kill you, kill him first’ is part of the rules of the Middle
East, and therefore we are killing like we have not killed since 1967.”
According to the United Nations Office for
the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (Ocha), since 7 October 2023,
Israel has killed 1,081 Palestinians in the West Bank and the occupied East Jerusalem, including at least 235 children.
Bluth attributed the high number of
Palestinian deaths to orders he gave, which made it easier for Israeli
soldiers to open fire at civilians.
He said troops are permitted to shoot, from the knee down, at Palestinians attempting to cross the West Bank separation barrier.
“Today, there are many ‘limping memorials’
in Palestinian villages of those who tried to infiltrate and got hit,
so there is a price that is paid,” Bluth said, according to Haaretz.
Preferential treatment for settlers
Bluth admitted that his subordinates do
not shoot Israelis who throw stones at army forces because of
“sociological implications,” while they kill Palestinians who do the
same.
He added that in 2025, Israeli forces killed 42 Palestinians accused of stone-throwing, which he described as terrorism.
When shown footage of settlers throwing
stones at troops, he cited an incident in which two masked Israelis were
shot, noting it caused a public outcry.
Bluth’s remarks come amid growing
discontent about his actions among hilltop youth, the settler militias
who terrorise Palestinians communities in the West Bank, who view him as
yielding to left-wing and international pressure.
Ex-Mossad chief says Israeli settler violence reminds him of the Holocaust
Last week, Haaretz reported
that Bluth labelled the growing numbers of settler attacks as “terror,”
and criticised hilltop youth who establish outposts without
coordinating it first with the army’s command.
Bluth added that the army, with the
coordination of the settlers, established some 150 outposts in Area C in
the West Bank in recent years, which he alleged helped prevent
Palestinian “terror” and building expansion.
Last week, Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech, a vocal supporter of the settler militias, called Israel Defence Minister Israel Katz to immediately fire Bluth from his post over his remarks.
Meanwhile, the Israeli NGO Peace Now reported
on Sunday that the Israeli government assigned some 130 million shekels
to those same settler groups under the guise of curbing settler
violence.
The funds were allocated towards “reducing
risk situations and expanding positive responses for youth in the Judea
and Samaria area,” using the Israeli name for the West Bank.
Peace Now said the funds will, in
practice, be used to strengthen the settlements and “channel millions”
to their regional councils.
“The government uses every excuse to
justify pouring more and more millions into settlements. This is a
programme to expand settlements under the guise of combating violence,”
Peace Now statement said.
“The government is directing a significant
portion of the funds to the same actors and activities that currently
serve as the main supporters of the outposts and farms from which the
violence originates,” the NGO added, calling on the government to stop
the funds and the army and police to stop the violent acts.
Amnesty International has called for the
release of abducted activists Saif Abu Keshek and Thiago Avila, who have
been detained by Israel since its forces intercepted Global Sumud
Flotilla vessels while in international waters last week.
Abu Keshek and Avila are “at great risk of
human rights abuses, including torture and other ill-treatment,”
Amnesty said, citing its “previous documentation of the abuse inflicted
on flotilla activists detained in October 2025 at the hands of the
Israeli authorities”.
The NGO said it was especially concerned
about Abu Keshek, “a Palestinian-Spanish-Swedish national”, as he is
“being detained on suspicion of affiliation with a terrorist
organization given Israel’s discriminatory laws and persistent record of
harassment and oppression of Palestinians under Israel’s system of
apartheid”.
Amnesty International called on Israel to “immediately release them and ensure they are protected while in custody”.
As we reported earlier, Israeli rights
group Adalah said Israel’s Beersheba District Court had rejected an
appeal for the activists’ release, ruling instead to extend their
detention to Sunday morning.
Iran’s permanent mission to the UN has
urged member states to reject a resolution drafted by the US and its
Gulf allies pressing Iran to ensure safe passage for shipping through
Hormuz, calling it “flawed” and “politically motivated”.
“The only viable solution in the Strait of
Hormuz is clear: a permanent end to the war, the lifting of the
maritime blockade, and the restoration of normal passage,” said Iran’s
UN mission in a post on X.
It went on to accuse the US of using the
resolution to “advance its political agenda and legitimise unlawful
actions – not to resolve the crisis”.
Lawyers says two activists are being subjected to ‘psychological torture’ as their detention is extended for another week
Activist Thiago Avila, a member of the
Global Sumud Flotilla seized by Israel in international waters, sits at a
magistrate’s court hearing in Ashkelon, Israel, 3 May 2026 (Amir
Cohen/Reuters)
Published date: 5 May 2026 12:08 BST | Last update:21 hours 34 mins ago
Two activists seized by Israeli
forces in international waters while en route to deliver humanitarian
aid to Gaza have been threatened with death or lengthy imprisonment,
their lawyers said on Monday.
The legal centre Adalah, which represents Thiago Avila and Saif Abu Keshek, said the pair have been subjected to psychological abuse and held in solitary confinement since their capture last week.
On Tuesday, a court in the southern Israeli city of Ashkelon extended their detention until Sunday.
Abu Keshek, a Spanish-Swedish national of
Palestinian origin, and Avila, a Brazilian national, were detained late
on Wednesday when Israeli naval forces raided a Gaza-bound aid flotilla
in international waters off Greece.
They were taken to Israel and accused of
assisting the enemy during wartime, contact with a foreign agent,
membership of and providing services to a terrorist organisation, and
transferring funds to such a group. Both deny the charges.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Since their detention, the men have been
held in cells under constant bright light, a practice intended to cause
sleep deprivation and disorientation, according to Adalah. They are also
blindfolded whenever taken out of their cells, including during medical
examinations, which it described as a serious breach of medical ethics.
Global Sumud Flotilla: When states fail, humanity sets sail
Avila reported being subjected to repeated
interrogations lasting up to eight hours, during which he was allegedly
threatened that they would be “killed” or “imprisoned for 100 years”.
He is also being held in very low temperatures, the group said.
The two men, now in solitary confinement,
have entered their sixth day of a hunger strike in protest at what legal
experts have described as an unlawful seizure outside Israel’s
territorial waters.
Lawyers Hadeel Abu Salih and Lubna Tuma of
Adalah told the court the case was “flawed and unlawful”, arguing there
is no legal basis for applying Israeli law to foreign nationals in
international waters.
During Friday’s raid, Israeli forces
intercepted at least 21 Gaza-bound vessels and detained 175 activists,
in what organisers from the Global Sumud Flotilla described as an act of
“piracy”.
The boats were seized about 600 nautical miles from Gaza’s coast, near the Greek island of Crete.
Spain and Brazil issued a joint statement on Friday describing the detention of Avila and Abu Keshek as illegal.
(L/R) US Secretary of State Marco Rubio
looks on as US President Donald Trump speaks to the press following US
military actions in Venezuela, at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm
Beach, Florida, on January 3, 2026.
(Photo by Jim Watson/ AFP via Getty Images)
The president is using the power of the US
military to steal the wealth of Latin American countries to enrich
himself, his family, his closest business associates, and US
corporations.
Some lawmakers have grown so alarmed by the Trump administration’s actions in Latin America that they are beginning to accuse the administration of gangsterism.
Representative Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) saw the possibility of gangsterism at the start of the second Trump administration when he warned that the United States could “join the ranks of gangster nations,” but there is a growing sense in Congress that the day has arrived.
At a congressional hearing last month, Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas) asserted that the Trump administration is exploiting the US military to take Latin American resources for US corporations. Castro seemingly channeled the anti-war critiques of Smedley Butler,
the US military hero of the early 20th century, who condemned war as a
racket and lamented his exploitation as a racketeer for capitalism.
“For decades, our men and women in uniform
who volunteered to protect our country became mercenaries ordered to
risk their lives to protect the profits of US corporations,” Castro
said. “Today, President Trump is ordering them to do so again.”
The Case of Venezuela
The Trump administration’s critics in Congress have been warning about the administration’s gangsterism due to its actions in Venezuela.
Since the Trump administration directed a military operation earlier this year to seize Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and take control of the country’s oil
and minerals, several lawmakers have suggested that the administration
has begun to employ force and intimidation as its basic tools of
statecraft.
Lawmakers have condemned the
administration for conducting a military operation without congressional
approval, meddling in Venezuela’s internal politics, displaying
contempt for Venezuela’s political process, facilitating corruption in Venezuela and the United States, and using the US military to take control of Venezuela’s resources.
Now that the Trump administration has
moved against Venezuela, establishing new leadership and doling out
profits from its resources, lawmakers anticipate that it will move
against Cuba next.
“You are taking their oil at gunpoint,” Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told Secretary of State Marco Rubio earlier this year.
Although Congress has not held the
president accountable, as the Republican majority in each chamber
supports the president, critics have kept pressure on the White House, prompting officials to defend the administration’s actions.
At the congressional hearing last month,
State Department official Michael Kozak claimed that the intervention in
Venezuela advanced US interests. He cited the Monroe Doctrine,
which marks Latin America as a sphere of influence. Like the president,
he boasted that the United States now controls the country’s resources.
“We’ve got very significant control over the oil revenues at this point,” Kozak said.
Several Democratic lawmakers responded
with strong criticisms. They condemned the Trump administration for
acting so aggressively in the hemisphere, and they warned that its
actions would create a backlash against the United States.
Representative Sydney Kamlager-Dove
(D-Calif.) described the administration’s approach as “shameful.” She
insisted that the United States should not be “reviving a policy of
domination and subjugation in the Western Hemisphere through the Monroe
Doctrine.”
Castro repeated his warning that the Trump
administration is focused on commerce and profits. He suggested that
the president is using the US military to enrich people close to him.
“What has happened now is that there’s a
group of folks that the president favors in his circle that is able to
commence commerce and make money off of, whether it’s valuable minerals,
oil, anything else in Venezuela,” Castro said.
Kozak expressed disagreement with Castro’s
analysis, but he acknowledged that the Trump administration has
established significant controls over Venezuela. Once again, he boasted
that the Trump administration controls the country’s resources.
“People can lift oil and sell it on the
open market, but all that money goes into an account that we have
control over,” Kozak said. “All the revenues that are coming from the mining
sector and everything, instead of going into their bank accounts, are
coming into the Treasury accounts, and then we can dole it out as we see
fit.”
The Case of Cuba
Now that the Trump administration has
moved against Venezuela, establishing new leadership and doling out
profits from its resources, lawmakers anticipate that it will move
against Cuba next.
For months, President Donald Trump has been openly threatening Cuba. He has moved to block oil shipments to the country, causing an economic crisis. Knowing that he has put tremendous pressure on the Cuban government, he has demanded that the country’s president leave office.
“I do believe I’ll be having the honor of taking Cuba,” Trump said in March. “I think I could do anything I want with it, if you want to know the truth.”
Critics are giving serious consideration to the idea that Trump’s wars are a racket and that Cuba may be next.
Although the Trump administration’s
military intervention in Iran has shifted its focus away from Cuba, the
administration is maintaining an economic stranglehold over the island
nation, making its recovery impossible. The US military continues
blocking the free flow of oil to Cuba, even while Trump demands the free
flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz. The few oil shipments that
have reached Cuba, for instance a recent tanker from Russia, have provided little relief.
At the congressional hearing last month,
several lawmakers argued that the Trump administration is a major reason
why Cuba is facing such tremendous hardship, including island-wide blackouts and preventable deaths at hospitals and health clinics.
“We cannot ignore our own country’s role in the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe in Cuba,” Castro said.
Rep. Jonathan Jackson (D-Ill.), who recently visited
the country, made the strongest criticisms. Warning that the
administration’s policies are causing tremendous harm to the Cuban
people, he indicated that the Trump administration is violating
international humanitarian law.
“We have engaged in collective punishment,” Jackson said.
The congressman also accused the Trump
administration of trying to make life so miserable for the Cuban people
that they would rise up and overthrow the Cuban government. He described
it as a failed “policy of starving” Cuba.
“It was one of the most cruel things I had ever seen in my life,” he said.
Just as the Trump administration has been
able to get away with its actions in Venezuela, however, it has been
able to continue its policies toward Cuba. The administration maintains
support among Republicans and some Democrats, few of whom oppose the administration’s goal of regime change.
The president, who knows that he faces
little opposition in Congress, continues threatening to direct a
military intervention in Cuba, even citing the operation in Venezuela as
a precedent.
“In January, our warriors flew straight
into the heart of the Venezuelan capital, captured the outlawed dictator
Nicolás Maduro, and brought him to face American justice,” Trump said
last month. “And very soon this great strength will also bring about a
day 70 years in waiting. It’s called, ‘A New Dawn for Cuba.’”
War Is a Racket
When Smedley Butler spoke against his
exploitation as a racketeer for capitalism nearly a century ago, he made
a criticism of the American way of war that was considered to be so
radical by US leaders that it has been largely excluded from mainstream
political discourse.
Only a few politicians, such as former Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) and Ron Paul
(R-Texas), have cited Butler and his warnings. Rarely, if ever, does
the mass media report on war as a racket in which the country’s leaders
are exploiting US military forces as gangsters for capitalism.
Today, however, some elected leaders are
beginning to issue the same kinds of warnings about the Trump
administration. Alarmed by the president’s insatiable lust for wealth
and power, they are starting to suggest that the president is engaging
in a kind of gangsterism across Latin America. The president, they say,
is using the power of the US military to steal the wealth of Latin
American countries to enrich himself, his family, his closest business
associates, and US corporations.
“By any measure, this is the most corrupt administration in American history,” Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said earlier this year.
Now that the Trump administration is openly pillaging
Venezuela and getting away with it, several lawmakers are warning that
it may apply the same approach to other Latin American countries.
“It’s making me think that the goal in
Cuba is going to be the same,” Castro said at the hearing in April.
“It’s who’s going to go over there that’s friends with the president to
make money and who’s going to profit off of Cuba and the Cuban people.”
Indeed, there is a growing sense in
Congress that the Trump administration is turning to gangsterism. Moving
beyond standard establishment critiques of the president’s contempt for
norms and traditions, critics are giving serious consideration to the
idea that Trump’s wars are a racket and that Cuba may be next.
Published date: 4 May 2026 12:14 BST | Last update:19 hours 42 mins ago
Israel has expanded its control of the
Gaza Strip to nearly 60 percent of the territory despite the ceasefire,
as it prepares for a possible resumption of the war, Army Radio reported
on Sunday.
Senior military officials, cited by the broadcaster, said they are pressing to restart fighting, arguing that now is the optimal moment to defeat Hamas.
Operational plans for renewed attacks have
been completed, the report said, with a final decision pending approval
from Israel’s political leadership.
The military has also reduced forces in southern Lebanon while redeploying brigades to Gaza and the occupied West Bank.
The Army Radio also reported there has been an increase in attacks lately.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Meanwhile, Israeli forces have expanded
the so-called “Yellow Line” to absorb more of Gaza, pushing the
population into roughly 40 percent of the enclave while troops remain
stationed across the remaining 60 percent in the south, north and east.
Gaza cannot be rebuilt until Palestinians control their own political future
The US brokered a ceasefire
in the Gaza Strip in October, intended to end Israel’s two-year
genocide by halting attacks and allowing humanitarian aid to flow into
the territory.
However, Israel has repeatedly violated the ceasefire, killing at least 832 Palestinians in near-daily shelling, according to the Palestinian health ministry.
Overall, Israeli forces killed more than
72,000 Palestinians since October 2023. Thousands more remain missing
and beneath rubble.
Under the agreement, Israel was required
to lift restrictions and allow up to 600 aid trucks a day carrying food,
fuel, medical supplies, shelter materials and commercial goods.
However, Gaza authorities say Israeli limits have kept the average at
just over 200 trucks daily.
Additionally, the Israeli military
controlled nearly half of Gaza when the ceasefire began, establishing a
unilateral demarcation known as the “Yellow Line”. The agreement’s later
phases envisaged a gradual Israeli withdrawal from all of Gaza.
However, Israeli forces have since steadly
expanded the “Yellow Line” and now control 59 percent of the territory,
according to Army Radio.
In one of the scariest moments in modern history, we're doing our best at ScheerPost to pierce the fog of lies that conceal it but we need some help to pay our writers and staff. Please consider a tax-deductible donation.
Joshua Scheer
This war isn’t just being fought with
missiles—it’s being waged through oil markets, currencies, and corporate
balance sheets. And while the world watches bombs fall, something
quieter—and far more consequential—is happening: a global energy system
is being weaponized in real time.
This on The Geopolitical Economy Report with Ben Norton.
Ben digs into the role oil plays at the center of the war on Iran—and
how the United States turned itself into the world’s top oil producer to
weaponize that power globally. He breaks down the push to sideline
OPEC, the UAE’s dramatic exit, and the political fiction of American
“energy independence.”
Oil Was Never Just Fuel — It Was Always the Weapon
One of the clearest lessons of the war on
Iran isn’t merely military. It’s structural. Oil is not just a
commodity. It is power. It is leverage. It is the bloodstream of the
global economy—and increasingly, the preferred instrument of empire.
For decades, the global system has
revolved around the petrodollar, a quiet but foundational arrangement
ensuring that most of the world’s oil is bought and sold in U.S.
dollars. Even today, an estimated 80% of global oil transactions still
run through that system. But the architecture is showing cracks.
Sanctioned nations such as Russia, Iran, and Venezuela have begun
trading outside the dollar, challenging the financial scaffolding that
has long underpinned U.S. dominance.
Yet the story is not simply one of
decline. Because while the dollar faces pressure, the United States has
quietly secured something arguably more consequential: control over
production itself.
In just over a decade, the U.S.
transformed from a major importer into the largest oil producer on
Earth, responsible for roughly 14–15% of global output. The shale boom
didn’t just reshape domestic energy markets—it rewired the geopolitical
landscape. Washington no longer merely polices the system; it helps
shape it directly. And in wartime, that shift becomes decisive.
Crisis for the World, Windfall for Big Oil
As the conflict with Iran escalated,
global oil prices surged—nearly doubling in 2026. For billions of
people, that spike translates into inflation, food insecurity, and
economic instability. For poorer nations, it is nothing short of
devastating.
But for U.S. and Western oil corporations,
the crisis has been a windfall. Profits have soared, with some
companies reporting earnings double those of the previous year. As
supply chains fracture and traditional exporters are destabilized or cut
off, American firms have stepped in—expanding exports to Europe and
Asia and filling the void left by war.
The pattern is unmistakable: global pain, concentrated gain.
The Strait That Can Shake the World
At the center of this crisis sits one of
the most strategically vital chokepoints on Earth: the Strait of Hormuz.
Before the war, roughly 20% of the world’s traded oil passed through
this narrow corridor each day. When Iran moved to disrupt it, the
message was not subtle—it was existential.
Shut the strait, and the global economy trembles.
This is what modern warfare looks like:
not just territory and airspace, but shipping lanes, pipelines, and
market flows. Control the flow of oil, and you control the tempo of the
world economy.
Breaking OPEC, Rewriting Power
Another quiet earthquake has reshaped the
landscape: the United Arab Emirates’ withdrawal from OPEC. On paper, it
looks bureaucratic. But historically, OPEC represented something
radical—a collective attempt by Global South nations to control their
own resources and wrest power from Western oil giants.
Weakening OPEC weakens that collective leverage. And it strengthens something else.
Washington has never opposed cartels in
principle—it has opposed cartels it doesn’t control. The long‑term
objective has been consistent: ensure that corporations aligned with
U.S. power, not sovereign states, set the terms of the global energy
market.
The Myth of “Energy Independence”
The familiar talking point insists that the U.S. is “energy independent,” insulated from global chaos. It isn’t.
Oil is priced globally. When prices spike,
everyone pays—regardless of where the oil originates. The U.S. still
imports millions of barrels per day, and its infrastructure depends on
specific grades of crude it does not produce in sufficient quantities.
“Independence” is political messaging, not economic reality.
From Oil Shock to Food Crisis
And here is where the crisis becomes
catastrophic. Oil is not just fuel—it is fertilizer, transport, and the
backbone of modern agriculture. As energy prices surge and supply chains
fracture, farmers worldwide are already facing shortages.
The likely result is grimly predictable:
rising food prices, shrinking harvests, and widespread hunger. This is
not speculation. It is the logical downstream effect of an energy shock
of this scale.
The Real Takeaway
This war is not contained. It is not regional. It is not temporary. It is systemic.
It is reshaping how power works—who
controls energy, who sets prices, and who pays the cost. And as always,
the burden falls downward: onto workers, onto poorer nations, onto the
global majority.
Meanwhile, at the top, the machinery hums.
Profits rise. Influence expands. The line between state policy and
corporate interest blurs even further.
Oil was never just fuel. It was always the weapon. And now, it is being used exactly as intended.
On 30 April 2026, I was on “Deep Dive”
with Lt. Col. (ret.) Danny Davis talking about what President Trump is
likely to do in Iran over the next few weeks and the consequences of
that war on the global order.
It is very difficult to know for sure what
Trump will do in Iran, as he is desperate and he was foolish enough to
start this disastrous war in the first place. My guess is that he will
continue the naval blockade until he is forced to accept defeat and cut a
deal because the world economy is about to go over the precipice. There
is no way, however, that he wins this war.
It is stunning how unsuccessful the US and
Israel have been in this war. Not only have they failed to achieve any
of the four major goals laid out before the war, but Iran now has a
stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz, and — as Danny and I talked about
at some length — the US has wrecked the security architecture that it
built up with the Gulf states before 28 February 2026. And don’t forget
that the US, which has been committed to pivoting to East Asia to
contain China since the early days of President Trump’s first term
(2017), is now pivoting away from Asia to the vortex in the Middle East.
What a disaster!
When France entered the city of Aghwat (Laghouat) in Algeria in 1852,
it burned two-thirds of its inhabitants to death in just one night.
A woman carries an Iranian flag during a pro-government gathering at
Enqelab-e-Eslami, or Islamic Revolution, square in Tehran, Iran, May 4,
2026
![Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez awards the Order of Civil Merit to UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese, on 7 May 2026 [sanchezcastejon/X]](https://i0.wp.com/www.middleeastmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/pedro-sanchez-francesca-albanese-award.jpeg.webp?fit=920%2C615&ssl=1)
