𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐬𝐥𝐚𝐦

 

Many people equate Islamist with Islamic and Islam with Muslims. It happens everywhere. But these words need to be differentiated.

-- Nasir Khan

For the last three decades, the term 'Islamist' has frequently been used in political discourse about political Islam. It stands for those misguided and indoctrinated ignorant people whose aim is to impose their fanatical versions of Islam on others.

But we should keep in mind that Islam as a world religion is followed by people with different world outlooks who are divided into numerous sects. Furthermore, these followers have varying interpretations of the role of political power, about the leaders of the Islamic community (Ummah) and the rights and obligations of the rulers and the ruled, etc. etc. These views of Islamic law, Sharia, cover civil and criminal law that again are subject to four main schools of jurisprudence within Sunni Islam while the Shias have their own jurisprudence. There is little chance of any unity of ideas among them.

What is most alarming about Islamists' general worldview is their negation of the universal dimension and inherent tolerance of this world religion. Instead, they put forward a narrow and anti-social version that goes against all principles of democracy, respect for religious minorities and inculcates bigotry against the followers of other faiths. The whole process can be termed as creating mental and religious ghettos, absolutely closed to rational thought but hell-bent on myopic divisions and conflicts. In such a suffocating universe, there is no room for mutual accommodation, or acceptance of secularism in a multi-religious and multi-cultural world in which we live in Europe, some parts of America or Australia.

Islamists' misuse of Islam is a dangerous phenomenon for democracy and common social and political values of the present age.