Nancy Pelosi
There she was on The View on Monday, and Joy Behar, a good progressive, actually asked her a decent question on why she wasn’t pursuing impeachment.
Pelosi’s response was unbelievable: “If somebody had a crime that the president had committed, that would be a different story.”
You’ve got to be kidding me!
For starters, Bush himself admitted that he wasn’t obeying the FISA law when he was spying on people without first getting a warrant from the FISA court as required explicitly in the statute.
Then there is the torture and kidnapping that he has countenanced. That violates U.S. statutes and treaties.
And what about the wholesale corrupting of the Justice Department, which pursued political prosecutions and illegally discriminated against prospective employees on the basis of their personal views?
Then there’s the outing of Valerie Plame, and the cover up of that outing.
And what greater crime can you commit than waging a war of aggression and lying a country into war?
The evidence on impeachment, as Dennis Kucinich has courageously and thoroughly demonstrated, is overwhelming. On Democracy Now, Kucinich responded to Pelosi’s claim.
And for a breakdown of the statutes, Constitutional articles, and treaties that Bush has violated, go to AfterDowningStreet.org, and in particular, to http://www.pubrecord.org/docs/vega/kucinich-bush-articles-of-impeachment-violations.pdf.
How much more does Nancy Pelosi need?
This is not a case of political tag or gotcha.
This is about the Constitution and the rule of law.
That Nancy Pelosi can fob it off so facilely just shows how derelict she is in her duties.
No comments:
Post a Comment